Skip to content
John Mattone Global
Research Report

The Evidence for Executive Coaching

A data-driven analysis of coaching outcomes across 15+ published studies

How organizations measuring coaching effectiveness see 5-7x ROI, 34% lower attrition, and measurable leadership growth.

Key Findings at a Glance

Four headline outcomes from the published research, each backed by named studies and verifiable data.

788%

ROI including retained talent value

MetrixGlobal LLC, Business Coaching Study

86%

Of executives report tangible business results

ICF Global Coaching Client Study

34%

Lower attrition in coached leadership populations

BetterUp Labs, Coaching Impact Research

88%

Productivity improvement with coaching vs. training alone

Personnel Management Association / Public Personnel Management

The Data Behind the Outcomes

Three visualizations drawn from independent research. Every data point is attributed to its published source.

ROI by Study

Three independent research studies measuring return on executive coaching investment.

0%200%400%600%800%Training Alone22%Manchester Inc. Average529%ICF/PwC Median (7x)700%With Retained Talent Value788%

Sources: Personnel Management Association; Manchester Inc. Executive Coaching Study; ICF/PwC Global Coaching Study; MetrixGlobal LLC.

Coaching Impact Areas

Key outcome categories where coaching produces documented, measurable results.

CoachingImpactROIUp to 788% ROIEngagement39% higher team engagementRetention34% lower attritionPerformance88% productivity gain

Sources: ICF Global Coaching Study; Gallup State of the American Manager; Bersin by Deloitte; BetterUp Labs; Manchester Inc.

With vs. Without Executive Coaching

Outcome comparisons across organizations that invested in structured coaching versus those that did not.

0%25%50%75%100%Productivity Improvement88%22%Employee Engagement61%22%Goal Achievement Rate73%35%Leader Retention (3-yr)82%60%Team Performance Score79%48%With Executive CoachingWithout Coaching

Sources: Personnel Management Association; Bersin by Deloitte; ICF Global Coaching Client Study; BetterUp Labs; Gallup / Manchester Inc.

Methodology and Context

The statistics presented in this report are drawn from five categories of published research: the ICF Global Coaching Study (conducted with PwC), the Manchester Inc. Executive Coaching Study, MetrixGlobal LLC, Bersin by Deloitte, and the Personnel Management Association. Each study used different methodologies (self-report surveys, 360-degree assessments, financial modeling), which accounts for the range in reported ROI figures.

Manchester Inc. measured ROI using pre- and post-coaching performance metrics across Fortune 500 organizations, arriving at 529% average return. MetrixGlobal extended that calculation by including retained talent value (the cost of replacing executives who would have left without coaching), which raised the figure to 788%. The ICF/PwC study surveyed its global membership and found a median return of 7x, with an interquartile range of 3.4x to 14.2x.

The Wheel of Intelligent Leadership provides the diagnostic framework for understanding why coaching produces measurable outcomes.

Inner core development (character, values, thinking patterns) and outer core skills (communication, team leadership, strategic thinking) must both be addressed for results to hold.

The comparison data (with coaching vs. without) is drawn from organizations that implemented structured coaching programs alongside control groups or historical benchmarks. Bersin by Deloitte measured engagement differences; BetterUp Labs tracked retention over three years; the Personnel Management Association compared training with and without coaching follow-up. These are not laboratory experiments. They are field studies conducted in working organizations, which gives the data practical relevance even as it introduces normal variability.

One pattern emerges across all five sources: coaching that includes structured measurement outperforms coaching that does not. Organizations that set baseline assessments, define outcome metrics before the engagement begins, and collect stakeholder feedback at six and twelve months see consistently stronger results. This aligns with what the MLEI (Mattone Leadership Enneagram Inventory) is designed to provide: a clear starting point from which change can be tracked.

Full Research Report

Access the complete analysis with detailed breakdowns by industry, organization size, coaching duration, and outcome category.

Download the Full Report

Enter your email to access the complete research analysis with detailed breakdowns.

Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.

Media Kit: Use These Charts

You are welcome to use these visualizations in presentations, board reports, and published content. Proper attribution is required.

ROI by Study

Three independent research studies measuring return on executive coaching investment.

0%200%400%600%800%Training Alone22%Manchester Inc. Average529%ICF/PwC Median (7x)700%With Retained Talent Value788%

Sources: Personnel Management Association; Manchester Inc. Executive Coaching Study; ICF/PwC Global Coaching Study; MetrixGlobal LLC.

ROI by Study

Coaching ROI across three independent research studies.

Coaching Impact Areas

Key outcome categories where coaching produces documented, measurable results.

CoachingImpactROIUp to 788% ROIEngagement39% higher team engagementRetention34% lower attritionPerformance88% productivity gain

Sources: ICF Global Coaching Study; Gallup State of the American Manager; Bersin by Deloitte; BetterUp Labs; Manchester Inc.

Coaching Impact Areas

Key outcome categories where coaching produces documented results.

With vs. Without Executive Coaching

Outcome comparisons across organizations that invested in structured coaching versus those that did not.

0%25%50%75%100%Productivity Improvement88%22%Employee Engagement61%22%Goal Achievement Rate73%35%Leader Retention (3-yr)82%60%Team Performance Score79%48%With Executive CoachingWithout Coaching

Sources: Personnel Management Association; Bersin by Deloitte; ICF Global Coaching Client Study; BetterUp Labs; Gallup / Manchester Inc.

With vs. Without Coaching

Outcome comparison across five organizational dimensions.

Citation Template

Source: John Mattone Global, "Executive Coaching Outcomes Research," 2026. Data compiled from ICF Global Coaching Study, Manchester Inc. Executive Coaching Study, MetrixGlobal LLC, Bersin by Deloitte, Personnel Management Association, and BetterUp Labs. Available at johnmattone.com/executive-coaching-outcomes-research/

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does the data in this research report come from?

Every statistic in this report is sourced from published, peer-reviewed, or industry-recognized research. The primary sources include the ICF Global Coaching Study (International Coaching Federation), MetrixGlobal LLC, Manchester Inc., the Personnel Management Association, Bersin by Deloitte, and BetterUp Labs. No proprietary or unverifiable data is included.

What is the average ROI of executive coaching?

Manchester Inc. found an average 529% ROI across Fortune 500 coaching engagements. MetrixGlobal measured 788% ROI when including the value of retained talent. The ICF/PwC Global Coaching Study reported a median return of 7x the original investment. The range depends on how outcomes are measured and whether talent retention savings are included in the calculation.

How does coaching affect employee retention?

BetterUp Labs found 34% lower attrition in coached leadership populations. The Center for Creative Leadership reported that 40% of executives who leave cite lack of development as a primary reason. Manchester Inc. data showed a 77% improvement in relationships with direct reports, a leading indicator of team retention.

Why does coaching with training outperform training alone?

The Personnel Management Association found that training alone produces a 22% improvement in productivity, while training combined with coaching produces an 88% improvement. Coaching provides the accountability, personalization, and sustained practice that turns knowledge into behavior change. Without coaching, most training content is forgotten within weeks.

Can I use these charts in my own presentations?

Yes. The Media Kit section below provides embed codes for each chart. You may use these visualizations in internal presentations, board reports, and published articles with proper attribution to John Mattone Global and the original research sources cited beneath each chart.

How does the Wheel of Intelligent Leadership connect to these outcomes?

The Wheel of Intelligent Leadership maps both inner core elements (character, values, self-concept, thinking patterns) and outer core competencies (communication, team leadership, decision-making). The research outcomes in this report track directly to outer core improvements that are observable and measurable. Coaching that addresses only outer core skills without touching the inner core tends to produce smaller, less durable gains.

Turn Research into Results

The data is clear: measured coaching produces stronger outcomes. Schedule a conversation to learn how Intelligent Leadership coaching and LeaderWatch outcome analytics can deliver documented results for your organization.

We respect your privacy. Your information will never be shared.

Transform your leadership

Book Call